Village Person Wins Big in Suit to Reclaim His Interest in Village People’s Iconic Hits

A California district judge issued an important copyright decision yesterday, holding that Defendant Victor Willis, the original lead singer of the Village People, is entitled to terminate his post-1977 grants to two publishers, Can’t Stop the Music and  Scorpio Productions, of his copyright interests in 33 musical compositions , including the monster hits, “YMCA,” “In the Navy,” and “Go West.”

Continue reading

An IP Address Is Not Sufficient Evidence to Identify a Person

A New York federal judge quashed and/or limited adult film industry plaintiffs’ requests for early discovery in a copyright infringement case stemming from numerous “John Doe”  defendants’ supposed illegal downloading of adult films. As a part of his analysis in this ruling,  U.S. Magistrate Gary R. Brown held last Tuesday that an IP address is not sufficient evidence to identify a specific person in a case alleging that pornographic copyrighted material was illegally downloaded. According Magistrate Brown, “It is no more likely that the subscriber to an IP address carried out a particular computer function — here the purported illegal downloading of a single pornographic film — than to say an individual who pays the telephone bill made a specific telephone call.”

Continue reading

For Once, A Counterfeiter We Can All Get Behind (well, most of us anyway)…

Did you see the New York Times story on admitted counterfeiter Hyman Strachman, street name: ”Big Hy?” Big Hy is not selling his bootleg DVD’s out of the trunk of his car in his hood or at Long Island flea markets.He’s sending them by the carton-load to US Troops overseas and he has been doing so for nearly ten years. Big Hy is not involved in an organized criminal enterprise–he’s a 92-yr old Jewish military veteran who spends his days and his disposable income making sure our soldiers get to see the movies that everyone at home is talking about–The Hangover, The King’s Speech, and Moneyball, just to name a few examples.

Continue reading

EU Ruling Allows ISP’s to Provide User Data to Copyright Holders

The European Union’s highest court ruled Thursday that national data retention laws do not prevent Internet service providers from sharing customer information that copyright holders can use to identify individuals that they believe have engaged in illegal file-sharing.

Churches and Other Not-For-Profits Face Unique Issues When Determining Who Owns the Intellectual Property They Create

Churches and other not-for-profits are filled with creative people that are…well….creating. Ministers are writing sermons and books, music leaders are writing beautiful choruses, graphics people and web designers are illustrating messages and the website with fantastic and sophisticated creations. These items that are created as the organization fulfills its mission are works of intellectual property. Creative works like the ones described above are subject to copyright law. Who owns this intellectual property? The organization or the individual that created it?

Continue reading

The Ray Charles Foundation sues Ray’s Children Over Copyrights

One of my all-time favorite singers is in the news this week. The Ray Charles Foundation, a charitable organization founded by Ray Charles to fund research and provide education relating to hearing loss, sued seven of Charles’ twelve children recently for allegedly breaching an agreement they made with their father regarding their rights to his musical compositions. According to the complaint, Mr. Charles gathered his children around him in December of 2002, Continue reading

Trayvon Martin Case and Intellectual Property Issues

This case has been heart-breaking on so many levels, no matter your position on the social issues that are implicated. Whether you believe Zimmerman  acted in self-defense or created a situation where someone’s beloved son was killed while minding his own business, carrying a Snapple and some Skittles, there is no question that many lives have been destroyed, careers ruined, and, most tragic by far,  a child with a promising future is dead.  It is not for me to decide what happened in this case because I wasn’t there and I don’t know. I have friends with different views on Zimmerman’s actions and motives, but all I can think about is Trayvon’s parents, and the parents of other young African-American boys or men, who live in  fear that the same thing could happen to their child. I have no answers and nothing but my heart-felt sympathies to offer to these families.

Continue reading

Copyright Fair Use – Is it or Isn’t it?

As an intellectual property lawyer, I often get questions from clients that have received a cease and desist letter alleging copyright infringement. One important defense to copyright infringement is the “fair use” defense, in which you basically say, “Okay, I copied it, but the use I made of your copyrighted material was legal.” Fair use is a very fact-intensive analysis and you often can’t know whether something was actually fair use or not until a judge or jury makes such a determination after trial. Because most people cannot afford to go the distance to determine the viability of the defense, the defendant who has used the copyrighted material often settles or removes the offending material (if possible) rather than litigate. In order to avoid being accused of copyright infringement altogether, it is helpful to understand the rules of fair use, which are discussed very comprehensively  in this resource from the Stanford University Libraries. I have found it be very useful, particularly the summary of fair use cases in Part C. I have also written earlier on this topic, here and here. I hope you find these  resources to be useful guidance on this complicated and fact-intensive issue, which can otherwise be a complete roll of the dice. And, I hope you are never in the position of having to convince a mad copyright holder that your use was fair.

Here’s a First – a Heart-Warming Trademark Story

Actor Stephen Fry has confirmed that he and Sir Ian McKellen will pay a licence fee so that a Southampton pub in  England can continue to use the name they’ve traded under for twenty years—The Hobbit.

The pub was threatened with legal action by Saul Zaentz Company (SZC) of Hollywood, which accused it of infringement.  SZC owns the worldwide rights to several brands associated with author JRR Tolkien, including The Hobbit and The Lord of The Rings. Although half this article talks in terms of “copyrights,” I feel certain  it is really talking about trademark infringement.

In an effort to get SZC to back off, the pub’s supporters set up a Facebook page, which has more than 57,000 supporters. Sir Ian, who plays Gandalf in the Lord Of The Rings films, described the  film company’s actions as “unnecessary pettiness” and Fry said it was “self-defeating bullying”. The actors began tweeting about the situation and Fry ultimately offered to pay a licensing fee so that the Hobbit could continue to operate under that name.

This case is another interesting example of the little guy using the power of social media to make a trademark “bully” back down. However, as an IP lawyer, I am sympathetic to the mark owner’s plight–you either defend your mark or you lose it. However, unless the SZC folks had used the mark on a pub, I’m not sure that any confusion would be likely. At any rate, you will still be able to knock down a cold Frodo at The Hobbit after a long day in Southhampton, and that’s a good thing in anybody’s book.

Joel and Victoria Osteen Win Dismissal in Copyright Infringement Case

Evangelists Joel and Victoria Osteen get a temporary reprieve in the copyright suit brought against them by writer of the song “Signaling Through the Flames,” courtesy of every defendant’s best friends, Twobley and Iqbal. The Texas district court granted their motion to dismiss because the plaintiffs failed to allege facts showing that the Osteens had a financial stake in the infringing activity and personally supervised the infringing conduct. The plaintiff was given leave to amend so the Osteens will undoubtedly have to face this issue again.